Tuesday, October 25, 2011

Path-Goal Theory


Path—goal theory is used by almost every successful leader. According to our book, “path—goal theory is designed to explain how leaders can help subordinates along the path to their goals by selecting specific behaviors that are best suited to subordinates’ needs and to the situation in which subordinates are working.” I read an article a few weeks ago that stated Steve Jobs was a great leader because he was able to direct and motivate subordinates. Although Steve Jobs was not seen as the most personable leader, I believe he was a good example of a path—goal leader.
Steve Jobs defined the goals of Apple. He wanted Apple to be number one in innovation and wanted employees to “think differently.” I believe this “think differently” approach helped remove obstacles for subordinates. Most companies want employees to do exactly what they’re told, but Steve Jobs and Apple wanted employees to think outside the box and “think differently.” Obstacles were removed and employees were given free reign to think outside the box, providing a boost for Apple’s innovation. Steve Jobs also provided support for subordinates. He supported new ideas that subordinates came up with and this helped make things like the iPod and iPad so successful.
To be a successful path—goal leader a leader must be directive, supportive, participative, and achievement oriented. The leader must be able to adapt and must realize what drives the subordinate. If a subordinate needs to have control on a project, the leader must be participative and provide involvement. On the other hand, if a subordinate has a need for affiliation, the leader must be supportive and provide nurturance.
The path—goal theory is important because it allows the leader to see what behaviors affect the subordinate positively or negatively. Path—goal theory allows the leader to change their leadership style based on the subordinates’ personality.

7 comments:

  1. I think Jobs is a very good example of an ethical leader who uses path-goal theory. He was very successful because of this as well. It allowed him to motivate his employees to be one of the greatest companies in this decade.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think another example of a great leader who used Path-goal very well is Martin Luther King Jr. He removed obstacles in society for his followers to stop the racism that was going on!

    ReplyDelete
  3. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I agree with your thoughts on Steve Jobs, but in general can a leader be great at the path-goal theory and be unethical?

    Someone can argue that Rob Blagojevich was a good leader, but he was not ethical. Could that be true? Or does a leader have to be ethical in order to be a good path-goal leader?

    ReplyDelete
  5. I'm not really sure what "obstacles" Blagojevich would've removed while being a leader. He was very unethical, however seemed to be a strong, good leader.
    I believe it is possible though. An example that I'm thinking of is nobody popular, but an executive at my workplace. He is a very good leader, lets people know what's going on, as well as guides people around obstacles to have successful days at work. However, I don't believe he's a very ethical leader. Sometimes he can think about himself way too much, and not about the team, as well as a lot of people don't get along with him because he talks behind peoples back.
    I believe that in most cases, you can only use path-goal theory traits as an ethical leader, however there are small examples I can think of when looking at unethical leaders.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Brad I agree that it is possible to be a good path-goal leader and also be unethical. I think there are plenty of leaders that do what is right for their government, coorporation, or employees. A leader can remove obstacles and lead his/her followers toward a common goal but in doing that, they can be unethical.

    ReplyDelete
  7. A unethical leader that comes to mind is Hitler he had a bunch of obstacles when he was trying to become ruler of Germany. Germany was in a very deep depression since just losing in world war 1. The economy was a mess the cities across the country were rumble. He had the leadership to bring them back to the top and make them one of the best industrialized nations in the world at that time. But he had a lot of underlying unethical means of getting there.

    ReplyDelete